ArticleApplications in plant sciences2026
Petal to the metal: The slow road to automating large-scale phenology labeling for herbarium specimens.
Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Herbarium specimens represent critical historical records of plant phenology, yet automating annotation of reproductive structures remains challenging given the diversity of floral morphologies, specimen age and quality, and image quality. Methods: Here, we present a machine learning pipeline that uses an ensemble modeling approach to detect flowers on herbarium specimens and deliver these data to the phenology research community. After testing multiple strategies for generating training data, we found that in-house expert-curated annotations were essential for producing reliable results. Results: Expert validation found that the modeling pipeline detected present floral structures with relatively strong accuracy but had moderately high false negative rates. Applying the ensemble to our filtered final image dataset of 22 million records resulted in 11.1 million records labeled with flowers present. However, only 2.9 million of these contained the complete metadata necessary for downstream phenology research, highlighting the need for full label digitization efforts. Discussion: The dataset presented here represents a large compilation of historical herbarium-derived phenology records available as a resource for the phenology community. We end by demonstrating how integrating these machine-labeled records into Phenobase, a publicly available phenology database, expands taxonomic and temporal coverage for large-scale phenological analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.