Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824837›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

Systems Thinking: Identifying Leverage Points for Achieving a Continuum of Competency-Based Health Professions Education.

Karen E Hauer, Arvin K Damodaran, Jason R Frank, Soeren Huwendiek, Adrian P Marty, Denyse Richardson, Daniel J Schumacher, Pedro Tanaka, Teri Lee Turner, Denise H Rhoney and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen E HauerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-4045
Arvin K DamodaranSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-9483
Jason R FrankCentre for Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-0146
Soeren HuwendiekDepartment for Assessment and Evaluation, Institute for Medical Education in Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-9633
Adrian P MartyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-9730
Denyse RichardsonDivision of PMR (Physiatry), Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-158X
Daniel J SchumacherDepartment of Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-8452
Pedro TanakaStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-3122
Teri Lee TurnerDepartment of Pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-5447
Denise H RhoneyUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, CB 7574, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7574, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0646-6111
International Competency-Based Health Professions Education Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competency-based education is widely endorsed in health professions education (CBHPE) as an outcomes-focused approach to ensuring that all graduates demonstrate the competencies needed to improve patient and population health. Despite adoption of outcomes frameworks, accreditation requirements, and CBHPE tactics, interventions remain siloed within programs and training levels rather than spanning the education to practice continuum. Consequently, learners and teachers experience fragmented educational journeys that can fall short of addressing each learner's needs for continuous learning and growth. To advance efforts toward a CBHPE continuum, this systems-informed conceptual analysis uses a systems thinking perspective to analyze leverage points, places within complex systems where small, strategic interventions can cause large-scale, lasting changes. Drawing on Meadows' framework for understanding leverage points in complex systems, we examined barriers and opportunities to achieve a continuum and present five theoretically informed, literature-based, and expert-derived recommendations for transformation. Our analysis revealed that strategic intervention points, including paradigm shifts from 'time-served' to 'competence-demonstrated' readiness, structural changes through cross-continuum governance alignment, and process modifications via shared competency language and data systems, enable meaningful transformation beyond surface-level adjustments. Key recommendations include: (1) restructuring system architecture to enable seamless learner progression through competency committees and joint governance bodies; (2) shifting mental models to normalize time-variable progression and reconceptualize assessment as growth-supporting; (3) implementing high-impact approaches to assessment with longitudinal learner analytics; (4) changing rules and incentives to reward competency achievement; and (5) establishing continuous data-driven feedback systems. Understanding these leverage points informs targeted approaches, enabling a cohesive, coordinated, learner-centered CBHPE continuum.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationHealth OccupationsSystems AnalysisClinical CompetenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID42824837
PMCPMC13629538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.