ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
Pediatric Emergency Care Variation: Might Normothetic Data Undermine Adaptive Expertise?
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Practice variation across physicians is commonly attributed to idiosyncratic tendencies. What factors contribute to physicians' practice variation in the disposition of children with asthma exacerbation? How do metrics demonstrating variation impact physicians and learners? Methods: In this social constructivist qualitative study, we interviewed 11 Pediatric Emergency Medicine attendings, purposively sampling across a spectrum of acute asthma exacerbation admission rates. Participants reflected on their recent care of patients with asthma, how they assess patients, and how they determine disposition. They were shown a de-identified funnel plot demonstrating disposition rates across the physician group and reflected on the 1) quality of the metric and 2) impact on practice. We used reflexive thematic analysis to describe patterns across the data that addressed the study's research questions. Results: Participants cited factors at the patient, caregiver, clinical care team, clinical environment, and personal practice levels that might result in variation. Participants framed the ability to weigh these sometimes competing factors as a reflection of patient-centered care. But when presented with a group-level data display, participants were surprised by the variation, valued seeing how they practiced compared to peers, and sometimes expressed a willingness to alter their practices to be "nearer the mean." Conclusions: Some variation in care may be driven by physician adaptive expertise, which is not fully captured through metric-driven nomothetic data. Though metrics are fundamental to understanding practice patterns, decontextualized aggregations of data may risk minimizing, or even framing as deviant, the expertise exercised by physicians when they weigh multiple factors in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.