ReviewPediatric discovery2026
Integrating Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation With Less-Invasive Surfactant Administration: Current Evidence and Evolving Practice in Preterm Neonatal Care.
Review in Pediatric discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to summarize current evidence on the combined use of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) and less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. We conducted a narrative review of randomized controlled trials, comparative-effectiveness studies, meta-analyses, the 2022 European Consensus Guidelines on RDS, and recent clinical cohorts evaluating sNIPPV, LISA, and their combined application. Studies suggest that sNIPPV provides superior extubation tolerance and decreases apnea frequency compared with standard continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Compared with the intubation, surfactant administration, and extubation (INSURE) approach, LISA lowers early mechanical ventilation needs and decreases bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) rates. When applied together, the two strategies appear to improve procedural stability and decrease the likelihood of re-intubation, and may thus contribute to lower BPD rates due to their complementary physiologic effects. The sNIPPV-LISA combination is physiologically complementary and clinically promising. Current evidence supports a reduced rate of respiratory failure and a trend toward reduced BPD compared with CPAP and the INSURE technique of surfactant administration. Larger randomized trials are required to determine its effects on long-term outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.