ArticleAntibody therapeutics2026
A landscape of sequence variants in 51 commercial antibody therapeutics.
Article in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sequence variants (SVs), unintended amino acid substitutions, represent a quality attribute of antibody therapeutics with potential safety and efficacy implications. Although control strategies are evolving, a comprehensive landscape of SVs in commercial antibody products, including biosimilars, innovators, and those from different expression systems or geographical origins, remains largely unexplored. Methods: We systematically analyzed SVs in 51 commercial antibody therapeutics via optimized high-sensitivity LC-MS/MS peptide mapping. The panel encompassed originators and biosimilars from Chinese and multinational firms, eukaryotic (CHO, NS0) and prokaryotic ( Results: Across all products, 3006 SV occurrences were identified. The vast majority (92.5%) were ≤0.1% per site. Only 7.5% (226 SV occurrences) exceeded 0.1%, 2.4% (72 SV occurrences) exceeded 0.2%, and a minimal 0.4% (12 SV occurrences) exceeded 0.5%. SV levels of Chinese biosimilars and innovators were comparable to international counterparts. While prokaryotic-derived products showed more SVs above 0.2%, SV levels showed no significant correlation with antibody subclasses or formats. Batch-to-batch consistency was excellent across all products. Conclusions: This study provides the largest empirical SV dataset for marketed antibody therapeutics to date. It demonstrates manufacturing processes maintain SV levels below 0.2% per site and reveals no inherent SV disparity across product origin, subclass, or format. Empirically, this 0.2% threshold serves as a pragmatic benchmark for commercial antibody quality control. These findings provide a science-based reference for establishing cell line screening in-process limits, refining industrial SV control strategies, and guiding regulatory science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.