Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824780›Full record

ReviewAntibody therapeutics2026

Beyond affinity: AI-supported developability assessment and multi-objective optimization in antibody development.

Qianhui Jiang, Jiahui Guan, Dan Yu, Pradeep Singh, George Pelekos, Edward Chin Man Lo, Junwen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qianhui JiangDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2690-7583
Jiahui GuanDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Dan YuDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Pradeep SinghDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
George PelekosDivision of Periodontology & Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Edward Chin Man LoDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Junwen WangDivision of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-4707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic antibodies are a major class of medicines, but high target affinity alone does not ensure manufacturability, stability, safety, or clinical success. Developability has therefore become a central constraint in antibody engineering and has pushed the field beyond affinity-first screening toward multi-objective decision-making. Machine-learning-based models increasingly integrate antibody sequence, structure, interaction, and assay data to estimate properties such as affinity, specificity, aggregation, viscosity, solubility, stability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics before experimental testing. In practice, these models are most useful when they help prioritize experiments rather than replace empirical evaluation. Here, we review the data resources used for antibody developability modeling, the main classes of property predictors, and optimization frameworks that balance competing design objectives. We cover Pareto optimization, Bayesian optimization, active learning, and conditional generative modeling, and discuss how these approaches are being adapted to bispecific antibodies and nanobodies. We argue that AI is most useful when model outputs are interpreted in the context of assay design, uncertainty, and antibody format, and when they are used to guide candidate selection and experimental design rather than serve as stand-alone surrogates for developability.

Indexed as

antibody developmentdrug discoverymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42824780
PMCPMC13628136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.