ReviewAntibody therapeutics2026
Beyond affinity: AI-supported developability assessment and multi-objective optimization in antibody development.
Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic antibodies are a major class of medicines, but high target affinity alone does not ensure manufacturability, stability, safety, or clinical success. Developability has therefore become a central constraint in antibody engineering and has pushed the field beyond affinity-first screening toward multi-objective decision-making. Machine-learning-based models increasingly integrate antibody sequence, structure, interaction, and assay data to estimate properties such as affinity, specificity, aggregation, viscosity, solubility, stability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics before experimental testing. In practice, these models are most useful when they help prioritize experiments rather than replace empirical evaluation. Here, we review the data resources used for antibody developability modeling, the main classes of property predictors, and optimization frameworks that balance competing design objectives. We cover Pareto optimization, Bayesian optimization, active learning, and conditional generative modeling, and discuss how these approaches are being adapted to bispecific antibodies and nanobodies. We argue that AI is most useful when model outputs are interpreted in the context of assay design, uncertainty, and antibody format, and when they are used to guide candidate selection and experimental design rather than serve as stand-alone surrogates for developability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.