Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824774›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026

Interpretable prototype learning for EGFR amplification prediction from whole-slide images in glioblastoma.

Homay Danaei Mehr, Imran Noorani, Cong Cong, Mark Fabian, Antonio Di Ieva, Sidong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Homay Danaei MehrCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.
Imran NooraniComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.
Cong CongCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.
Mark FabianDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Antonio Di IevaComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.
Sidong LiuCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the key biomarkers for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in glioblastoma (GBM). Current EGFR diagnostic methods, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing, are costly, time-consuming, and not uniformly accessible. A major challenge in whole-slide images (WSIs)-based prediction is to capture the full morphological heterogeneity of the tissue in a way that supports not only precise classification but also interpretability. To address these challenges, we proposed an automatic, interpretable prototype-learning framework that integrates a Variational Autoencoder with the Dirichlet Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model to determine optimal tissue prototypes from morphological features of hematoxylin and eosin-stained WSI, which guide the classification of EGFR amplification. The classification performance is evaluated using internal 5-fold cross-validation on the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and external validation on the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) dataset and the private GB-UK dataset. The proposed model achieved an area under the curve of 0.8087 ± 0.0153 for internal validation and 0.7740 and 0.7870 for external validations of the CPTAC and GB-UK cohorts, respectively, surpassing multi-instance learning models and conventional predefined clustering settings. Specific prototypes distinguish EGFR-amplified from EGFR-non-amplified cases, and histological analysis of these prototypes, which are consistent with expert-recognized morphological patterns, suggests an EGFR-amplified infiltration pattern. These findings demonstrate that the automatic prototype learning framework provides a rapid, cost-effective, interpretable, and scalable AI model for EGFR prediction in GBM, linking the learned prototypes to recognizable tissue patterns that can facilitate clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Computational pathologyEGFR biomarkerGlioblastomaHistopathological image analysisMulti-instance learningPrototype learningWhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID42824774
PMCPMC13627952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.