ArticleACS omega2026
Characterizing Variations in Binding Kinetics of Affinity Biosensors: A Boundary-Layer and Site-Quality Approach.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affinity biosensors rely on biological recognition elements immobilized on a transducer surface to capture specific target analytes. Binding kinetics between target molecules and surface-immobilized receptors are commonly analyzed using the Langmuir interaction model, which assumes homogeneous binding sites with constant kinetic parameters. Here, we present a computational framework representing the evolution of apparent binding kinetics using a normalized coverage-dependent distribution function. The model assumes that binding at relatively low surface coverage is dominated by more accessible and favorably oriented receptor sites, followed by increasing contributions from heterogeneous binding environments as surface coverage increases. The kinetic formulation was coupled with fluid-flow and convection-diffusion modeling to account for mass transport and near-surface residual analyte concentration. The framework was evaluated using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation measurements of IgG and C-reactive protein antibody-antigen interactions under varying experimental conditions. Quantitative assessment using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) showed consistently improved agreement with the experimental measurements relative to the classical Langmuir model, with one benchmark comparison yielding an NRMSE below 1.5% for the proposed model compared with more than 4% for the classical model. The results demonstrate that incorporating coverage-dependent apparent kinetics improves the description of the investigated high-affinity binding responses and provides a phenomenological framework for characterizing heterogeneous surface binding. By providing a more detailed description of coverage-dependent binding behavior, the proposed framework has the potential to support the design and optimization of affinity biosensors under practical operating conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.