ArticleSurgery open science2026
Building a surgical atrial fibrillation program: Programmatic evolution, safety, and three-year rhythm outcomes of hybrid ablation.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Surgical ablation is a guideline-supported treatment for symptomatic persistent and long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to catheter ablation, but how a program is built, refined, and sustained has not been described. We sought to describe the development of a de novo surgical ablation program as well as its procedural evolution, safety profile, and long-term rhythm outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the programmatic evolution of our program and growth of procedural volume and complexity. We also analyzed the long-term electrophysiologic and safety outcomes of all patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical ablation from 2020 to 2024. Rhythm assessment was performed using 12 lead ECG, wearable monitor, implantable loop recorder, or ICD/PPM interrogation following a 3-month blanking period after endocardial ablation. Results: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing hybrid surgical ablation between 2020 and 2024 at our institution were analyzed. Of which, one hundred and twelve had sufficient follow-up data. At 1, 2, and 3 years of follow-up, 94%, 85%, and 70% of patients were in normal sinus rhythm with 67% of those patients remaining off class I/III antiarrhythmic therapy at three years. There were no peri-procedural deaths, conversions to sternotomy, tamponade, strokes, or atrio-esophageal fistulae. Thirty-day adverse events occurred in 4 patients (3.6%) and included three patients with pericarditis and one patient with transient phrenic nerve palsy. The volume at our institution increased fourfold during the study period paralleled by increasing complexity and scope of operations. Conclusions: This experience provides a roadmap for developing a multifaceted hybrid ablation program with excellent safety and durable rhythm outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.