ArticleHealth science reports2026
Microbial Contamination of Radiology Equipment: A Descriptive Study in Ghana.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Nosocomial infections continue to impose significant clinical and economic burdens on patients and healthcare systems worldwide. Radiology equipment, accessories, and work surfaces can become contaminated with healthcare-associated pathogens due to frequent handling by healthcare personnel and patients. This study investigated microbial contamination on commonly used radiology equipment and surfaces at a major hospital in Ghana. Methods: This descriptive microbiological study involved weekly swabbing of 10 radiology equipment/accessories and surfaces using sterile nylon swabs over a 4-week period. Swab samples were transferred into bijoux bottles containing peptone broth to enhance microbial growth. For bacterial isolation, samples were inoculated onto MacConkey and Blood Agar plates and incubated appropriately. Bacterial isolates were identified based on colonial morphology, Gram staining, and biochemical reactions. Fungal cultures were performed using Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and incubated at 28°C for 7 days. Fungal isolates were identified using colonial morphology, tease mount preparation, and lactophenol cotton blue staining. Results: Microbial contamination was detected in 35 (87.5%) of the 40 samples analyzed. Identified bacterial isolates included coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Conclusion: Radiology equipment and surfaces harbored potentially pathogenic bacterial and fungal organisms, indicating their capacity to act as environmental reservoirs within radiology departments. The detection of both bacterial and fungal species on frequently touched radiology items highlights the need for strict adherence to infection prevention and control protocols to enhance the safety of both patients and healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.