Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824759›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Green Hydrogen Production Technologies and Feedstock Limitations: A Concise Review.

Yasmeen Saleh, Ayesha Alam, Labeeb Ali, Abdulrahman Alraeesi, Mohammednoor Altarawneh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasmeen SalehUnited Arab Emirates University, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Street, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Ayesha AlamUnited Arab Emirates University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Street, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Labeeb AliAbu Dhabi Polytechnic, Petroleum Engineering Technology Department, Abu Dhabi 111499, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-4801
Abdulrahman AlraeesiUnited Arab Emirates University, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Street, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammednoor AltarawnehUnited Arab Emirates University, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Street, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-3886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, intensive research is directed to green hydrogen production as an alternative to the depleting fossil fuel resources. Shifting from conventional hydrogen production routes, which rely on hydrocarbon reforming, toward cleaner and more sustainable pathways is a pivotal strategy to support decarbonization and minimize harmful emissions. Water and biomass are two abundant and sustainable resources that can serve as a promising green hydrogen feedstock. Water splitting into its constituents can be achieved by electrolysis, photocatalysis, and thermochemical techniques, while biomass can be converted into syngas through thermochemical processes, such as pyrolysis and gasification. Additionally, biomass has the potential to produce hydrogen through biological routes, like fermentation and microbial electrolysis processes. Electrolytic splitting of freshwater achieves a mass fraction of approximately 11.19% hydrogen (8.94 liters of water produces 1 kg of hydrogen). The highest energy efficiency of hydrogen (η

Identifiers

PMID42824759
PMCPMC13629396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.