ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2026
Feasibility and acceptability of strategies aiming to increase smoking cessation rates among people experiencing homelessness: A scoping review.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have high smoking rates, limited access to smoking cessation support, and face specific challenges in quitting tobacco. To date, optimal strategies to reduce smoking rates in this marginalized population are not clearly identified. This study aims to identify the feasibility and acceptability of smoking cessation interventions evaluated among PEH. Methods: We assessed evidence regarding the feasibility and acceptability of interventions promoting smoking cessation among persons aged >18 years, experiencing homelessness, and who smoke tobacco. We included primary quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies informing on PEH's and professionals' attending to their needs, experiences, and perspectives. We searched the scientific literature (PubMed, Web of Science) published up to 1 July 2026. Results: A total of 55 articles and six intervention categories were identified: 1) counseling/motivational interviewing (MI); 2) contingency management (CM); 3) text messaging-based interventions (TMI); 4) e-cigarettes; 5) collaborative professional models; and 6) smoking cessation policies. Most interventions aimed at increasing participants' motivation to quit smoking. Counseling/MI and CM were the most frequently tested programs, showing limited to moderate results. TMI had limited results with regard to smoking relapse. All tested interventions were deemed acceptable by participants. Patient-centered and harm reduction approaches were particularly appreciated. Conclusions: This scoping review shows that counseling/MI and CM, which appear to have limited to moderate effectiveness in terms of smoking cessation support among PEH, are well accepted; however, their feasibility is questionable - especially CM. Other forms of smoking cessation support show lower levels of effectiveness. There is a need for further research on effective and acceptable ways of promoting smoking cessation among marginalized groups such as PEH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.