Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824705›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2026

Group size modulates kinship dynamics and selection on social traits.

Peng He, Michael N Weiss, Samuel Ellis, Daniel W Franks, Michael A Cant, Darren P Croft, Rufus A Johnstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng HeDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7176-701X
Michael N WeissCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Samuel EllisCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-6040
Daniel W FranksDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-7470
Michael A CantCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1530-3077
Darren P CroftCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Rufus A JohnstoneDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's relatedness to its group may change with age due to demographic processes, and such kinship dynamics can shape age-linked social behaviors. Existing models, however, have focused almost exclusively on dispersal and mating, leaving the consequences of group size local variation unexplored. Here, we extend these models to incorporate such variation within a single, genetically connected meta-population. We then contrast predicted kinship dynamics and age-linked selection for helping/harming in coexisting smaller and larger groups in three typical social mammal systems characterized by distinct patterns of dispersal and mating, followed by exploring how group size local variation impacts female and male kinship dynamics across broader demographic contexts to clarify the population-genetic mechanisms. We show that, within the adult reproductive lifespans of these social systems, an individual's age-specific relatedness to others is higher, and changes faster (especially when younger), in smaller groups; consequently, smaller groups favor more extreme helping/harming (especially when younger)-in social system with bisexual philopatry with nonlocal mating (e.g., whales) that favors female shifts from harming to helping with age (which explains the evolution of menopause and postreproductive helping), such shifts are earlier in smaller groups. Further explorations suggest that, in a genetically connected population with group size local variation, group size effects on local relatedness are shaped by the relative strengths of ancestry dilution versus lineage coalescence, and kinship dynamics in a group reflect not only its local demographic conditions, but also those in coexisting groups of different size. Collectively, our study generates new insights into how female and male kinship dynamics emerge and vary under within-population group-size heterogeneity, and how such locally dynamic, varying kinship environments may help to explain variation in age-linked trends in social traits, such as the timing of menopause in social mammals.

Indexed as

gene flowgroup size variationinclusive fitnessinfinite island modelmenopausepopulation asymmetric subdivisionpopulation geneticssocial evolutionsocial life-history evolution

Identifiers

PMID42824705
PMCPMC13629233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.