Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824671›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Patient-Centered Assessment of Palatal Donor Site Healing Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Collagen: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Manish Rathi, Randhir Singh, Saravanan Sampoornam Pape Reddy, Delfin Lovelina Francis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manish RathiDepartment of Periodontology Army Dental Centre (Research and Referral) New Delhi India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-2506
Randhir SinghMilitary Dental Centre Khadakwasla Pune India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4405-4380
Saravanan Sampoornam Pape ReddyDepartment of Periodontology Army Dental Centre (Research and Referral) New Delhi India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-6125
Delfin Lovelina FrancisSaveetha Dental College and Hospitals Saveetha University Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science Chennai Tamil Nadu India saveetha.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3355-1322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Effective care of the palatal donor site after graft removal is vital for patient comfort and wound recovery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) compared with a collagen sponge as a dressing for palatal donor sites and its effects on patient-reported outcome measures. Materials and Methods: Patients requiring soft-tissue augmentation were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial. They were divided into two groups: PRF (experimental group) and collagen sponge (control group). De-epithelialized free gingival grafts were harvested from the palate, and donor sites were treated with either PRF or collagen sponge dressings. Patient-reported outcomes and wound-healing rates were evaluated. Results: Physical pain and physical disability scores were significantly better in the PRF group. Postoperative pain scores measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) were notably lower in the PRF group. No significant differences were found in psychological disability, social disability, or handicap scores between the groups. Conclusion: PRF appears to offer superior outcomes compared with collagen sponge for palatal donor-site management, including better patient comfort, faster healing, and cost-effectiveness. Further research is needed to establish the advantages of PRF over conventional treatments.

Identifiers

PMID42824671
PMCPMC13627858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.