Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824657›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

A Comparative Study of Forward Osmosis Systems: An Integrated Experimental, Modeling, and Techno-Economic Analysis.

Aicha Gasmi, Sabrine Chamam, Soumaya Ibrahimi, Milène Chroudi, Marc Heran, Ahmed Hannachi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aicha GasmiLaboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, Chemical Engineering Department, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia.
Sabrine ChamamLaboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, Chemical Engineering Department, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia.
Soumaya IbrahimiLaboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, Chemical Engineering Department, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-9480
Milène ChroudiLaboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, Chemical Engineering Department, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia.
Marc HeranInstitut Européen des MembranesIEM, UMR 5635, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier 34095, France.
Ahmed HannachiLaboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, Chemical Engineering Department, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Draw solution chemistry is a design parameter in forward osmosis (FO), governing hydraulic performance, organic rejection, fouling dynamics, and process economics, yet these dimensions are rarely evaluated together, particularly under wastewater feed conditions. This study addresses that gap through an integrated experimental, modeling, and techno-economic framework using three draw solutions (NaCl, MgSO

Identifiers

PMID42824657
PMCPMC13629018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.