ReviewFood chemistry: X2026
The hidden hazard in every sip: tackling microplastics in drinking water through detection and mitigation.
Review in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs), recognized as contaminants of emerging concern, have become global in drinking water systems, posing increasing risks to food safety, public health, and environmental sustainability. As drinking water represents a major route of human exposure, understanding the occurrence, detection, and mitigation of MPs is essential. This review comprehensively evaluates the predominant polymeric types of MPs detected in drinking water, including polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polyamide (PA), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), together with their major sources and formation pathways. The review critically compares the principles, advantages, and limitations of current analytical techniques, including Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), micro-FTIR (μFTIR), Raman and micro-Raman (μRaman) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), chemical imaging, pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS), and smartphone-based microscopy. Evidence from worldwide studies demonstrates that MPs are consistently detected in bottled, tap, and groundwater, with substantial variations in abundance, size, morphology, and polymer composition depending on water sources, treatment processes, and distribution systems. Conventional and emerging mitigation approaches, including coagulation-flocculation, membrane filtration, boiling, pulse clarification, and magnetic oxide-based composites, are also critically assessed with respect to their removal efficiencies and practical limitations. Furthermore, the review identifies key research gaps, including the lack of standardized analytical protocols, limited understanding of nanoplastics, and insufficient knowledge regarding long-term human health effects. By integrating current evidence on occurrence, analytical methodologies, health implications, and mitigation strategies, this review provides a comprehensive framework to support standardized monitoring and the development of effective approaches for improving drinking water quality and protecting human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.