ReviewJournal of bone oncology2026
Minimal residual disease and relapse surveillance in osteosarcoma: an action-linked framework integrating liquid biopsy and imaging biomarkers.
Review in Journal of bone oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma relapse surveillance remains dominated by scheduled imaging because salvage treatment depends on anatomical confirmation of pulmonary, local or extrapulmonary recurrence. However, radiological recurrence may occur after a biologically active phase in which residual viable disease or micrometastatic progression is already present but not yet localizable. This clinical-translational review reframes postoperative osteosarcoma surveillance as an action-linked decision workflow rather than a comparison of isolated biomarker technologies. Current evidence suggests that tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing provides the strongest osteosarcoma-specific minimal residual disease (MRD) signal, with postoperative positivity associated with inferior event-free survival and, in selected patients, molecular detection preceding imaging-confirmed relapse or progression. Cell-free DNA methylation may offer a mutation-independent adjunct, whereas circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles and circulating microRNAs remain exploratory signals without validated postoperative surveillance actions. Chest computed tomography (CT) and local magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remain indispensable for disease localization and treatment planning, while diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and radiomics currently provide mainly local viability or risk-enrichment information rather than proven surveillance-intervention evidence. The near-term role of integrated biomarkers is therefore not to replace guideline-based imaging, but to define protocolized pathways for molecular-positive/imaging-negative, imaging-positive/molecular-negative, concordant high-risk and concordant low-risk states. Future studies should test whether biomarker-triggered reassessment improves clinically meaningful outcomes, including resectability, second complete remission, clinical trial access, patient burden and survival, rather than simply documenting recurrence earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.