ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Mind the brain age: How segmentation and template selection reshape structural connectomes.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted MRI samples the directional diffusion of water in vivo, and tractography uses this information to reconstruct brain fiber pathways. Mapping streamlines to an anatomical parcellation yields structural connectomes. However, in older adults, where white matter alterations and atrophy are common, the choice of reference template and tissue segmentation could be particularly consequential for obtaining accurate, interpretable structural connectomes. Using a conventional pipeline, we evaluated how these two factors, the normalization template and the segmentation used to constrain anatomically guided tractography, affect connectome estimates in cognitively healthy elderly participants. These methodological choices produced systematic and significant differences in network topology and their relationships with clinically relevant variables across standard connectome measures, particularly in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Age-appropriate normalization and lesion-aware anatomically constrained tractography yielded networks with more plausible anatomy and more consistent relationships with cognition and imaging measures, whereas unconstrained tracking inflated density without improving interpretability. These findings demonstrate that structural connectome outcomes are contingent upon template and segmentation selection. We, therefore, advocate for explicit reporting of these methodological parameters and recommend the use of age-appropriate templates combined with white matter lesion-aware segmentation incorporating anatomically informed constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.