Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824471›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

From reference-genome prediction to causal generalization: sequence-to-function models for plant regulatory genomics.

Mingfang Zhan, Ruigang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingfang ZhanCollege of Life Sciences, Wuchang University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ruigang WuSchool of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence-to-function (seq2func) models predict molecular regulatory outputs from DNA sequence and can prioritize non-coding variants, annotate cis-regulatory elements (CREs), and design regulatory sequences. Although accuracy has improved, most models are trained and evaluated on observational data from one or a few reference genomes. Their performance may therefore not translate to natural haplotypes, structural variants, tissues, developmental stages, environments, or species. These limitations are especially important in plants, where pan-genomic diversity, transposable elements, polyploidy, long-range regulation, and genotype-by-environment interactions shape regulatory landscapes. This Mini Review summarizes seq2func modelling in plant regulatory genomics, discusses plant-specific challenges and the complementary value of observational and perturbation assays, and proposes evaluation frameworks based on biologically meaningful distribution shifts. We further outline how pan-genomes, multi-omics, genome editing, reporter assays, active learning, and continual learning could support closed-loop experimental-computational systems. Progress should be judged not only by reference-genome accuracy, but by calibrated and experimentally validated generalization across plant diversity.

Indexed as

cis-regulatory codecis-regulatory elementscrop improvementgenome editingmachine learningpan-genomeplant genomicssequence-to-function models

Identifiers

PMID42824471
PMCPMC13628167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.