ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disorder characterized by non-scarring hair loss. While traditionally viewed as a T-cell-mediated disease, recent advances have elucidated the central role of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway in its pathogenesis, establishing a self-sustaining inflammatory loop. The identification of this pathway has transformed AA from a condition with limited therapeutic options to one with targeted biological interventions. Over the past five years, multiple JAK inhibitors have received regulatory approval or shown promising results in clinical trials. Baricitinib, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, became the first FDA-approved systemic treatment for severe AA, followed by ritlecitinib, which targets JAK3 and TEC family kinases and deuruxolitinib targeting the JAK1/2. Other agents, including ivarmacitinib, and the topical agent delgocitinib, are under active investigation, offering varying selectivity profiles and routes of administration. Compared with conventional therapies, JAK inhibitors such as baricitinib and ritlecitinib demonstrated therapeutic efficacy rates of 40-50% in Phase III clinical trials. Because head-to-head trials among JAK inhibitors in AA remain lacking, the comparative efficacy discussed in this review is derived primarily from indirect, cross-trial comparisons and network meta-analyses. Despite these remarkable advances, the field currently faces several significant challenges, including variable treatment responses, incomplete hair regrowth in patients with severe AA, potential long-term safety risks, and the absence of validated biomarkers to guide patient selection or predict therapeutic outcomes. Comparative efficacy, treatment challenges, and future directions including combination strategies and biomarker-guided therapy are also discussed to support informed clinical decision-making and highlight unmet needs in AA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.