Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824446›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The attitudes toward hookah smoking in the MENA region scale (ATHS-MENA): factor analysis and validation.

Gabriel Andrade, Abderrahim Benlahcene, Enas Mohamed, Dalia Bedewy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel AndradeDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Abderrahim BenlahceneDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Enas MohamedDepartment of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Dalia BedewyDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hookah smoking poses a global health challenge, especially in the MENA region where it holds deep cultural significance. Existing smoking scales often lack the cultural nuances needed for accurate assessment. This study aimed to develop and validate a culturally relevant instrument, the Attitudes Toward Hookah Smoking Scale in the MENA region (ATHS-MENA). Methods: The ATHS-MENA was developed through a systematic process including item generation, expert review, cognitive interviewing, and pilot testing. The scale was administered to participants in the UAE. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified the factor structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess model fit. Convergent validity was tested against an existing smoking attitude scale. Known-groups validity was examined based on gender, nationality, Emirati status, and smoking behavior. Results: EFA revealed four factors: Hookah Engagement/Dependency, Social/Cultural Acceptance, Avoidance/Health Awareness, and Risk Minimization. The scale demonstrated high internal reliability (α = 0.94). Inter-factor correlations ranged from -0.41 to 0.57, with the four-factor solution explaining 68.4% of total variance. CFA indicated acceptable model fit following Conclusion: The ATHS-MENA demonstrates strong psychometric properties for assessing hookah smoking attitudes in the MENA region. Its culturally sensitive design enhances its relevance and utility for research and public health interventions aimed at addressing tobacco use in this population. Future research should address sampling limitations by recruiting more balanced samples and confirm the factor structure across diverse demographic groups.

Indexed as

hookah smokingMENA regionreliabilitysmoking behaviorvalidity

Identifiers

PMID42824446
PMCPMC13627424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.