ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Beyond static risk scores: dynamic world models simulating patient-specific trajectories to inform preoperative risk mitigation strategies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Static scores are used in preoperative risk assessment and provide an estimate of a patient's risk status at a specific time. They do not explicitly represent short-term changes in physiology or recorded care activity. The Dynamic Patient World Model (DPWM) is an alternative method of preoperative risk assessment that departs from static predictions of risk to simulation of the evolution of the patient's health status based on three components: (1) a patient state encoder to account for irregular multimodal clinical data; (2) an intervention-conditioned dynamic model to predict the change in state; and, (3) a counterfactual outcome evaluator to assess potential outcomes based on the current intervention(s) and/or other potential intervention alternatives. DPWM was evaluated against 14 baselines using 4 architectural types across 3 publicly available surgical databases (VitalDB, MIMIC-IV, eICU-CRD), with complication AUROC gains of 1.4-2.2 percentage points over the strongest temporal/world-model baseline; the 1.4-point VitalDB comparison was not statistically significant. Furthermore, in an outcome-conditioned retrospective analysis, 76.2% of DPWM-suggested interventions were concordant with clinical decisions associated with favorable outcomes; this does not estimate clinical benefit. Relative to DNN, DPWM achieved an NRI of 0.128 (95% CI: 0.062-0.194); ASA-PS subgroup comparisons were descriptive and did not isolate temporal information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.