ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Disease-specific heterogeneity of C-reactive protein across 21 hematologic disorders reflects divergent inflammatory and hematopoietic phenotypes.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is routinely used to quantify systemic inflammation, yet its interpretation in hematologic disorders is complicated by marked biological heterogeneity. We characterized pretreatment CRP distributions across a broad hematologic disease spectrum and examined whether CRP-laboratory associations differed among clinically relevant subtypes. Methods: This retrospective study included 4,823 patients aged ≥14 years with 21 hematologic disorders evaluated at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 2009 and 2023. Baseline CRP and routine laboratory variables obtained before disease-directed therapy were analyzed across diseases and within acute myeloid versus acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid versus chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin versus non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma with versus without extramedullary disease. Spearman correlations and CRP-quartile analyses were used to characterize covariation with hematologic, biochemical, and nutritional measures. An unweighted exploratory analysis of six nonconsecutive National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles compared participants reporting leukemia or lymphoma with non-cancer participants. Results: Baseline CRP differed substantially across the 21 disorders (global Conclusions: CRP is not a uniform marker across hematologic disorders. Its baseline concentration and accompanying laboratory phenotype depend on disease context, with prominent elevations in hyperinflammatory and selected aggressive disorders but limited value for identifying extramedullary myeloma. CRP should be interpreted as a context-dependent adjunct rather than a stand-alone diagnostic or prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.