SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Psychological, social, and behavioral barriers and facilitators to prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prehabilitation before cancer surgery improves postoperative outcomes, yet patient participation remains suboptimal. This qualitative systematic review aimed to synthesize psychological, social, and behavioral barriers and facilitators to preoperative prehabilitation among adult cancer patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in CNKI, Wanfang Data, CBM, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to January 13, 2025, with an updated search on May 31, 2025. A total of 1,184 articles were screened, and 20 qualitative studies were included. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Thematic analysis was employed for data synthesis. Results: The analysis identified 7 facilitating factors: (1) Introduction Mechanisms, (2) Value Recognition, (3) Support Systems, (4) Communication Strategies, (5) Motivation and Feedback Mechanisms, (6) Program Design Optimization, and (7) Process Convenience and Program Accessibility, and 4 barrier factors: (1) Cognitive and Informational Barriers, (2) Individual Factors, (3) Clinical Process Limitations, and (4) Implementation Environment Barriers. When mapped onto a psychological, social, and behavioral framework, psychological facilitators included regained sense of control, mood regulation, and altruistic motivation; psychological barriers encompassed fear, low self-efficacy, and illness-related distress. Social facilitators comprised family involvement, peer support, and professional encouragement; social barriers included insufficient family support and communication gaps. Behavioral facilitators were driven by immediate progress feedback and self-monitoring; behavioral barriers included scheduling conflicts and low exercise confidence. Conclusion: This synthesis reveals a persistent "cognitive-behavioral gap"-patients recognize the value of prehabilitation yet encounter barriers that prevent them from translating this recognition into sustained action. Addressing this gap requires integrated, multi-level strategies that enhance self-efficacy, mobilize social support, embed behavioral reinforcement mechanisms, and address systemic barriers. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420250650240.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.