ReviewCureus2026
Transition Toward Multimodal Integration in Cancer Therapy: Biological Rationales, Clinical Efficacy, and Pharmacological Challenges.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer treatment is increasingly moving beyond single-agent strategies because tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution, immune escape, and microenvironmental protection frequently limit durable disease control. Existing evidence remains fragmented across cancer types, treatment combinations, sequencing approaches, biomarker systems, and long-term safety outcomes, creating uncertainty regarding which patients benefit most from integrated therapy. This narrative review examines the biological rationale, clinical applications, treatment sequencing, precision tools, toxicity considerations, and implementation challenges associated with multimodal oncology. Relevant literature on surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, cellular therapy, locoregional interventions, liquid biopsy, and artificial intelligence was synthesized thematically. The available evidence indicates that coordinated treatment can improve local and systemic control, delay resistance, enhance immune activation, and support organ-preserving or adaptive strategies in selected malignancies. Benefits are greatest when combinations are mechanistically justified and guided by tumor biology, disease stage, and patient fitness. Major barriers include overlapping toxicity, variable biomarker performance, limited comparative data, financial burden, and unequal access to advanced diagnostics and therapies. Multimodal care should not be equated with indiscriminate treatment intensification. Its future depends on validated predictive markers, optimized sequencing, real-time response monitoring, adaptive trials, and multidisciplinary decision-making. Precision-guided integration is likely to define the next phase of personalized cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.