ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Differential pathways from arts and creative activities to student learning and wellbeing: the roles of belonging, self-efficacy, and self-regulation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Participation in arts and broader creative activities is associated with students' learning, emotional development, and wellbeing, but the psychological processes accompanying these associations remain insufficiently understood. Because all focal variables were observed in the same PISA 2022 cycle, the present study treats the proposed pathways as cross-sectional indirect-association patterns rather than as established temporal or causal mechanisms. Objective: This study examines whether school belonging, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and creative thinking show different cross-sectional indirect-association patterns linking a broad measure of arts-and-creative-activities participation with reading performance and subjective wellbeing. The comparison concerns outcome-specific association patterns and does not assume that participation temporally precedes the proposed intervening variables. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional secondary-data design was employed using the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 dataset. The analytical sample comprised 441,183 15-year-old students from 64 countries and economies that administered the creative-thinking assessment and provided linkable student-questionnaire data. Participation was represented by a bounded breadth index with an observed range of 0-8 (primary weighted M = 2.34, SD = 1.82). Distributional checking in the analysis-ready PISA subset confirmed concentration toward lower breadth values (median = 2, IQR = 1-4, skewness = 0.83). Structural equation modeling estimated pooled direct and joint indirect associations through school belonging, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and creative thinking. The models are interpreted as survey-weighted pooled associations; no country-specific latent-mean or structural-path comparisons are made. Results: Participation in arts and creative activities was positively associated with reading performance (total association β = 0.18, Conclusion: The pooled models identify positive direct and joint indirect associations between a heterogeneous arts-and-creative-activities breadth measure and both outcomes. The cross-sectional design does not establish temporal or causal mediation, and the analysis does not make strongest-mediator claims. The multi-country estimates are interpreted as survey-weighted pooled averages rather than evidence that structural relations are identical in every country. The findings apply to the broad participation construct and do not demonstrate effects of formal arts education or any single art form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.