ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
XEN63 Gel Stent in Glaucoma: Narrative Review and Expert Perspectives on Patient Selection, Surgical Technique, and Perioperative Management.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The XEN gel stent (AbbVie Inc. North Chicago, IL, USA) is a minimally invasive bleb-forming surgical device designed to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). The 63 μm gel stent has a larger lumen than the 45 μm gel stent, creating lower outflow resistance, which may translate into greater IOP-lowering potential. However, the comparative evidence base remains limited, heterogeneous, and largely retrospective; the magnitude and durability of any advantage over the 45 μm device should be interpreted cautiously. This narrative review summarizes the currently available evidence and expert surgical perspectives on patient selection, pre- and intraoperative practices, implantation technique, and postoperative practices with the 63 μm gel implant. Particular attention is given to conjunctival and Tenon's tissue management, use of mitomycin C (MMC), management of postoperative IOP elevation, and recognition and treatment of hypotony. The article is based on a targeted review of the literature combined with unstructured expert input and was not conducted as a systematic review or formal Delphi consensus. Based on the available evidence and expert perspectives, the 63 μm gel stent may be a useful option for selected patients requiring IOP in the low- to mid-teens. However, outcomes depend heavily on patient factors, surgical technique, and postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.