Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824306›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

XEN63 Gel Stent in Glaucoma: Narrative Review and Expert Perspectives on Patient Selection, Surgical Technique, and Perioperative Management.

Iqbal Ike K Ahmed, Jose Maria Martinez-De-La-Casa, Antonio Maria Fea, Karsten Klabe, Luis Abegão Pinto, Herbert A Reitsamer, Paramjit Singh, Ingeborg Stalmans, Vanessa Vera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Iqbal Ike K AhmedJohn Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5600-7242
Jose Maria Martinez-De-La-CasaDepartment of Ophthalmology and ORL, Ophthalmology Unit, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San-Carlos (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9441-0542
Antonio Maria FeaDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Ospedale Oftalmico di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6551-6054
Karsten KlabeBreyer, Kaymak, & Klabe Augenchirurgie, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-640X
Luis Abegão PintoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Unidade Local de Saúde (ULS) de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-7579
Herbert A ReitsamerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, SALK/Paracelsus Medical University, University Clinic Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Paramjit SinghAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Ingeborg StalmansDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Vanessa VeraAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The XEN gel stent (AbbVie Inc. North Chicago, IL, USA) is a minimally invasive bleb-forming surgical device designed to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). The 63 μm gel stent has a larger lumen than the 45 μm gel stent, creating lower outflow resistance, which may translate into greater IOP-lowering potential. However, the comparative evidence base remains limited, heterogeneous, and largely retrospective; the magnitude and durability of any advantage over the 45 μm device should be interpreted cautiously. This narrative review summarizes the currently available evidence and expert surgical perspectives on patient selection, pre- and intraoperative practices, implantation technique, and postoperative practices with the 63 μm gel implant. Particular attention is given to conjunctival and Tenon's tissue management, use of mitomycin C (MMC), management of postoperative IOP elevation, and recognition and treatment of hypotony. The article is based on a targeted review of the literature combined with unstructured expert input and was not conducted as a systematic review or formal Delphi consensus. Based on the available evidence and expert perspectives, the 63 μm gel stent may be a useful option for selected patients requiring IOP in the low- to mid-teens. However, outcomes depend heavily on patient factors, surgical technique, and postoperative care.

Indexed as

intraocular pressureintraoperative proceduresopen-angle glaucomaXEN63 gel stent

Identifiers

PMID42824306
PMCPMC13627763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.