ArticleiScience2026
Evidence for early and late prediction error-associated ERP responses during probabilistic cueing.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probabilistic relationships are omnipresent in our sensory environment. According to some predictive coding models, the processing of deviations from expectation should be accompanied by enhanced neuronal responses, reflecting a prediction error, while expected stimuli should lead to suppression of brain responses. However, probabilistic cueing designs show no clear picture regarding prediction error and expectation suppression. Here, we measured event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants were presented with a probabilistic cueing procedure with low, high, or equal-probable stimuli, while the task relevance of the probabilistic relations was varied. Our data show enhanced ERPs to infrequent stimuli in early (increased negative amplitudes over posterior electrodes) and late (increased positive amplitudes over central electrodes) time windows, driven by a prediction error and not by expectation suppression. While early visual responses are independent of task-relevance of predictive information, later and hierarchically higher effects are potentiated if predictive information is explicitly attended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.