ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
A deep learning approach to county-level soybean yield forecasting using large-scale environmental data.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Agricultural systems continue to be disrupted by climate change, making crop yield forecasting a critical component towards informed agricultural planning. However, current yield forecasting approaches often lack in scale and are hard to interpret agronomically within real world scenarios. To fill the gap, this study developed an interpretable soybean yield forecasting framework using quantifiable county-level climate and soil attributes at scale for early, accurate yield predictions months ahead of harvest. Methods: Here, 388 climate, soil, and elevation attributes were collected from a ~100-year time span over the continental US. After preprocessing, Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were computed for each factor to aid in the interpretability of forecasts within the framework. Using the combined climate factors, a deep learning neural network was tuned and constructed to produce yield forecasts in May, June, July, and August. Results: On a hold-out test set, these forecasts produced robust predictions, indicating the framework can reliably predict yields up to five months ahead of harvest. This study also indicated the importance of several environmental attributes towards yield forecasts; specifically, extreme temperatures during later summer months (DX90, EMXT) were found to have outsized negative contributions towards soybean yields, while timing of heat was also identified as a potential driver of yield (DYXT). Discussion: Overall, these findings indicate that our interpretable DNN model is capable of providing reliable, in-season soybean yield forecasts as early as May, offering a robust tool for agricultural stakeholders to adjust management strategies well before harvest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.