Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824213›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026

Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Synthetic Computed Tomography for Pedicle Screw Navigation in Children: A Feasibility Study.

Jaysson T Brooks, Judy-Mae Lima, Emmanuel Ogu, David Thornberg, Daniel J Sucato, Amy McIntosh, Megan Johnson, Brandon Ramo, Vivek Kalia, J Herman Kan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaysson T BrooksScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Judy-Mae LimaSchool of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Emmanuel OguSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.
David ThornbergScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Daniel J SucatoScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Amy McIntoshScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Megan JohnsonScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brandon RamoScottish Rite for Children, Department of Orthopedics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Vivek KaliaScottish Rite for Children, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Herman KanScottish Rite for Children, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pedicle screw instrumentation using a fluoroscopy-assisted freehand technique (FAFT) or using navigation based on a preoperative traditional computed tomography (tCT) scan is a common practice. However, concerns remain regarding the long-term effects of repeated ionizing radiation exposure. In 2025, the first pediatric patients in the USA underwent navigated posterior spinal fusions (PSFs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) converted to CT scan-like quality, known as synthetic CT (sCT). The purpose of this study is to report on the clinical, radiographic, and complication outcomes of this cohort and compare radiation exposure between sCT, tCT, and FAFT modalities. Methods: Twenty patients received PSFs using sCT imaging and machine-vision image-guided surgical (MvIGS) navigation. Fluoroscopy was used in sCT cases to confirm the location of T12 and for small adjustments in alignment after rod insertion. To compare radiation exposure, the patients who received sCT were compared with a matched cohort of 135 patients receiving PSFs using the FAFT and 27 patients receiving PSFs using tCT imaging paired with MvIGS navigation. Radiation exposure was measured in mGy. Pedicle morphologies were measured and classified according to Sarwahi et al. Results: Twelve patients (63%) who received sCT had an idiopathic diagnosis. Mean age at surgery was 13.6 ± 4 years. Across 335 pedicles instrumented, 13% were type C or D in morphology. The mean radiation exposure to the 27 patients receiving a preoperative tCT scan combined with routine intraoperative fluoroscopy was 5.44 mGy. For the 20 sCT cases, the mean radiation exposure was 0.90 mGy, reflecting an 83.5% reduction in radiation ( Conclusions: Navigated PSFs utilizing sCTs paired with MvIGS navigation allow for instrumentation of small pedicles with an 83.5% reduction in radiation compared with tCTs and an 87.1% reduction in radiation compared with FAFT cases. Key Concepts: (1)In this study, synthetic CTs are created by taking MRIs and converting this imaging into CT-scan-like quality using a proprietary, artificial intelligence mediated algorithm.(2)Synthetic CTs, paired with MvIGS navigation, were used to navigate pedicle screws in idiopathic, syndromic, congenital, and neuromuscular scoliosis diagnoses.(3)Difficult type C and D pedicles were instrumented using MvIGS navigation based on sCT imaging.(4)There is an 83.5% reduction in radiation exposure to the patient for MvIGS navigation cases using synthetic CTs compared with MvIGS navigation cases using traditional CTs.(5)In comparison to patients receiving PSFs using a fluoroscopy-assisted freehand technique, MvIGS navigation cases using synthetic CTs resulted in an 87% reduction in radiation exposure for both the surgeon and the patient. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Indexed as

Machine visionPedicle screwSpine navigationSynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID42824213
PMCPMC13627132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.