ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Language Model for Age-Specific Patient Education in Pediatric Orthopaedics.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Describing complex orthopaedic surgical procedures and diagnoses to pediatric patients across a large age range and at varying levels of health literacy can be quite challenging. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers a potential solution by providing real-time age specific explanations for pediatric patients. The use of GenAI large language models (LLMs) could potentially allow providers to more effectively communicate complex medical problems in an age-appropriate and comprehensible manner. This study aims to validate the readability, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of responses produced by the ChatGPT-4 LLM (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA) when prompted to explain a specific pediatric orthopaedic procedure indicated for a given diagnosis to patients of 3 different age groups. Methods: ChatGPT-4 explanations were analyzed for 43 pediatric orthopaedic procedures and tests across prompts for 3 different age groups: 6 years old, 10 years old, and 14 years old. Responses were assessed for readability using 6 quantitative readability indices. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the responses were rated by 7 board-certified pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, who also compared them to their own explanations used in clinical practice. Results: Each of the 6 indices showed a significant difference in readability between the 6-, 10-, and 14-year-old age group prompts ( Conclusions: GenAI LLMs can generate age-specific explanations for common surgical procedures, treatments, and diagnostic markers in pediatric orthopaedics. Physicians validated the accuracy of its responses and demonstrated a high level of comfort using the GenAI explanations in clinical settings. Key Concepts: (1)An artificial intelligence (AI) language model adjusted its explanations based on the child's age, providing simpler language for younger children and more advanced explanations for older children.(2)Across 6 established readability measures, explanations written for younger children were consistently easier to understand than those created for older age groups.(3)Seven board-certified pediatric orthopaedic surgeons found the AI-generated explanations to be highly accurate, with an average rating of 4.15 out of 5.(4)Physicians were generally comfortable with the use of AI-generated educational explanations in practice, and their ratings were highly consistent with one another.(5)When reviewed by a physician, generative AI could be a helpful tool for improving patient education, health literacy, and shared decision-making in pediatric orthopaedic care. Level of Evidence: III/IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.