ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
The harmonization of global professional certifications in emergency management: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to examine methods for improving global professional certifications to achieve the ultimate goals of emergency management, such as reducing human casualties, economic damages, and psychological impacts. Methods: The research question, "How have global professional certifications in emergency management been harmonized?" was addressed through a narrative review as the primary methodology. Results: The study examined host nation-oriented global professional certifications and advocated for a shift toward multi-nation-oriented certifications, considering four key stakeholders: the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), emergency management agencies, and certification applicants. Discussion: Four stakeholders should work to transform host-nation-oriented certifications into multi-nation-oriented global professional certifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.