Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Evaluating online family life education modules across family stages: a pilot study.

Emma L Alexander, Krista Stewart, Hayley Poffenberger Taylor, AliceAnn Crandall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma L AlexanderDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Krista StewartDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Hayley Poffenberger TaylorDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
AliceAnn CrandallDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether online family life education (FLE) modules improved knowledge, attitudes, and confidence about key family health topics among young, middle, and older adults. Background: Family life education supports healthy familial relationships across generations. Traditionally, FLE has been offered in-person over multiple weeks. Online FLE could make it easier to reach families. Methods: The final sample was comprised of 164 adults (45% young adults, 45% middle adults, and 10% older adults). Ten online video modules (each ~10 min) were created by college students about a variety of family health topics. For each module, participants were asked to complete a pre-survey, watch the module, and then complete a post-survey. Data were analyzed in Stata 18. Results: Participants reported that the modules were clear, engaging, and well-organized. Participants showed significant improvements in knowledge and attitudes between the pre- and post-surveys for all modules, including 69 of the 75 the outcomes measured. Effect sizes were generally medium to large, with significant effect sizes ranging from 0.27 to 0.87. Long-term changes in family health were not significant. Conclusion: Short, online FLE modules can yield immediate gains in knowledge and attitudes across family health topics. Further refinement in methodology is needed to promote longer-term gains in family health. Implications: Brief, online FLE can strengthen knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy about family life issues across family life stages.

Indexed as

FamilyFamily HealthFamily RelationsHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternetAdultAgedDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdigital educationfamily life educationfamily life stagesfamily well-beingolder adultsyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42824173
PMCPMC13627363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.