ArticleJSAMS plus2026
Physical examination of the cervical spine should be conducted in female athletes with a history of concussion.
Article in JSAMS plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Female athletes may be at increased risk of injury following sports-related concussion (SRC), even after symptom resolution. Residual cervical spine impairments have been proposed as a potential contributor; however, these have not been well characterised in female athletes. This study aimed to examine whether a history of SRC was associated with clinical assessments of the cervical spine in female athletes. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 156 elite and pre-elite female athletes from water polo, soccer, diving, rugby-7s and cycling/BMX were recruited. History of SRC within the previous 12 months was self-reported. Assessments included questionnaires and physical examination of the cervical spine, comprising range of motion, manual examination, joint position error (JPE) and maximal isometric neck strength. Between-group differences were examined using univariable statistical analyses. Results: Athletes with a history of SRC demonstrated a higher prevalence of reduced cervical range of motion, positive findings on manual examination, increased JPE and a history of headaches or migraines compared with athletes without concussion history. No deficits in maximal isometric neck strength were observed in athletes with a history of SRC. Conclusion: Cervical spine impairments were more commonly observed in female athletes with a history of SRC within the previous 12 months, including in athletes who did not report current neck pain. These findings suggest consideration of targeted cervical spine assessment beyond symptom-based screening in athletes with a concussion history. Whether identification and management of cervical spine impairments influence subsequent injury risk requires investigation in prospective and interventional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.