SynthesisF1000Research2026
Models of Cultural Reproduction as Drivers of Socio-cultural Resilience: Insights from a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To examine the determinants influencing cultural reproduction, comprehend the fundamental concepts of cultural reproduction, and evaluate the model of cultural reproduction as a manifestation of socio-cultural resilience. Materials and Methods: The research employed the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, utilizing the PRISMA protocol and the PICO framework. Data were sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Google Scholar, chosen based on inclusion criteria (2015-2025, empirical articles, pertinent to socio-cultural resilience). Of the 688 initial articles, 143 studies met the criteria. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess quality, and NVivo 14 was used for thematic synthesis to find patterns of direct relationships, mediation, and moderation between factors. Results and discussions: The analysis identified eight principal factors: education, politics, family, economy, media, technology, religion, and community. Politics (15.3%) and education (17.6%) were the most important factors. Cultural reproduction operates through micro-macro interactions involving direct relationships (family, religion, community), mediation (education, media, politics, technology), and moderation (economics, technology). The resulting integrative model elucidates how this amalgamation of factors enhances socio-cultural resilience through conservation and value adaptation. Conclusions: Cultural reproduction serves both as a means of value preservation and as an adaptive mechanism that enhances social resilience. This research enhances Bourdieu's theory by incorporating digital and participatory dimensions, providing a conceptual foundation for sustainable cultural policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.