Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

External validation of predictive equations for determining the need for in-flight oxygen supplementation in patients with respiratory disease.

Murielle Emma Beaupré, Gao Sheng Huang, Bruno-Pierre Dubé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Murielle Emma BeaupréService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gao Sheng HuangService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bruno-Pierre DubéService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: Patients with chronic respiratory diseases may develop clinically significant hypoxemia during commercial air travel because of reduced cabin pressure. In-flight oxygen prescription is typically guided by hypoxic challenge testing (HCT), a procedure that is time-consuming, costly, and not universally available. Several predictive equations based on sea-level physiological measurements have been proposed as alternatives. We aimed to externally validate six published predictive equations by comparing their performance with HCT in a large, heterogeneous cohort of patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent HCT at our center between 2016 and 2026. Sea-level arterial blood gases, pulmonary function tests, and relevant clinical data were collected. Six published predictive equations (E1-E6) were used to estimate in-flight PaO Results: A total of 177 patients were included: 39 (22%) with COPD, 64 (36%) with ILD, 34 (19%) with cystic fibrosis, and 40 (23%) with other chronic respiratory diseases. Significant correlations between predicted in-flight PaO Conclusions: In this large external validation study, currently available predictive equations demonstrated insufficient diagnostic performance to safely replace HCT for determining the need for in-flight oxygen supplementation. Although several equations showed moderate to strong agreement with measured HCT PaO

Indexed as

air traveldesaturationfitness to flyhypoxic challengein-flight oxygenpredictive equations

Identifiers

PMID42823967
PMCPMC13626894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.