Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823948›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Emerging Neuromodulation, Electrical Stimulation, and Cellular Therapies for Adult Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Marissa G Castronovo, Annalisa Peburn, Aliya Atcha, Joshua Singh, Naman Gupta, Srivennela Veeramachaneni, Sahil Soota, Samantha Scott, Audra Koechle, Patrick E Barry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marissa G CastronovoOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Annalisa PeburnOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Aliya AtchaOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Joshua SinghOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Naman GuptaOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Srivennela VeeramachaneniOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Sahil SootaOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Samantha ScottOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Audra KoechleOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Patrick E BarryOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of nonsurgical modalities are used in the management of cervical spinal cord injuries (CSCIs). However, comparative analyses across these treatment modalities remain limited, hindering the development of standardized care protocols. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on nonsurgical interventions for CSCIs and identify trends, fundamental principles, and key gaps to inform clinical practice and future research. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar were systematically searched using predefined criteria. Articles were screened using Rayyan. Studies published in English between January 2004 and September 2024 involving adult patients with CSCIs and conducted in the United States were included. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and synthesized based on predefined parameters, and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram was generated. Identified interventions included neuromodulation, electrical stimulation, cellular therapies, pharmacologic treatments, and exercise-based rehabilitation. Most included studies reported improvements in neurophysiological, motor, or functional outcomes. However, findings varied across interventions and largely came from small studies with heterogeneous populations, protocols, and outcome measures. These findings map the current landscape of nonsurgical therapies for CSCIs rather than establish comparative treatment effectiveness. Although several interventions showed preliminary signals of benefit, the limited volume and heterogeneity of U.S.-based evidence preclude firm conclusions about treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

cellular therapiescervical spinal cord injuryexercise-based rehabilitationfunctional electrical stimulationneuromodulation therapiesnon-surgical treatmentspharamacologic treatmentscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42823948
PMCPMC13626868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.