ReviewCureus2026
Emerging Neuromodulation, Electrical Stimulation, and Cellular Therapies for Adult Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries in the United States: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of nonsurgical modalities are used in the management of cervical spinal cord injuries (CSCIs). However, comparative analyses across these treatment modalities remain limited, hindering the development of standardized care protocols. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on nonsurgical interventions for CSCIs and identify trends, fundamental principles, and key gaps to inform clinical practice and future research. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar were systematically searched using predefined criteria. Articles were screened using Rayyan. Studies published in English between January 2004 and September 2024 involving adult patients with CSCIs and conducted in the United States were included. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and synthesized based on predefined parameters, and a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram was generated. Identified interventions included neuromodulation, electrical stimulation, cellular therapies, pharmacologic treatments, and exercise-based rehabilitation. Most included studies reported improvements in neurophysiological, motor, or functional outcomes. However, findings varied across interventions and largely came from small studies with heterogeneous populations, protocols, and outcome measures. These findings map the current landscape of nonsurgical therapies for CSCIs rather than establish comparative treatment effectiveness. Although several interventions showed preliminary signals of benefit, the limited volume and heterogeneity of U.S.-based evidence preclude firm conclusions about treatment effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.