ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment and New Approach Methodologies: US FDA/Triangle CERSI Workshop Report.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric developmental safety assessment presents distinct challenges in drug development. Children undergo dynamic changes in organ systems and drug disposition pathways during development, and drug-related effects may be delayed or manifested differently than in adults. Pharmacovigilance data, primarily from adults, is not always predictive of the response in children. Historically, juvenile animal studies have been used for nonclinical pediatric drug safety assessments exclusively, but the reduction in animal testing is a goal of public health agencies. To address this concern, the Office of Clinical Pharmacology at the U.S. FDA and the Triangle CERSI (Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation) convened a workshop entitled: "Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)," attended by experts from regulatory agencies, academia, and industry. Discussions focused on three overarching topics: (i) Secondary Pharmacology Screening Tools for Assessing Pediatric Developmental Safety; (ii) Non-clinical Tools for Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment; and (iii) Computational and Data-Driven Tools for Pediatric Developmental Safety. These topics were examined within the framework of the S11 Nonclinical Safety Testing In Support of Development of Pediatric Pharmaceuticals and E11A Pediatric Extrapolation guidances, which promote structured, question-based pediatric extrapolation in drug development and authorization. The workshop concluded that NAMs hold considerable promise to advance the assessment of pediatric drug developmental safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.