ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2026
Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency (PDCD) comprises a group of monogenic disorders caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding subunits of, or regulatory components affecting, the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. The clinical phenotype spans a broad continuum, ranging from early onset congenital lactic acidosis to infantile or childhood onset global developmental delay with epilepsy, through to more attenuated adult-onset neurological presentations. Reports from patients and advocacy groups indicate substantial variability in clinical management across both emergency and outpatient settings and between centres internationally. This variability underscores the need for systematic evaluation of the evidence base and the development of harmonised, consensus-driven clinical guidelines to standardise care and improve outcomes. An international consortium of experts from Europe and North America, including metabolic physicians, neurologists, dietitians, geneticists and patient representatives, was convened. The group undertook a structured review of the literature and developed guideline statements addressing disease classification, recognition, diagnostic evaluation, dietary and non-dietary management, surveillance for complications, genetic counselling and transition to adult services. Each recommendation was assigned a GRADE rating reflecting strength and quality of evidence. Consensus was achieved using a Delphi methodology. In total, 199 recommendations reached consensus and constitute the core of these guidelines. These recommendations provide a framework for consistent, high-quality, multidisciplinary care. The process also identified key evidence gaps, highlighting priorities for future research and the ongoing need to develop effective disease-modifying therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.