ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Brain Dynamics Underlying Reaching Movements Under Uncertainty.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor responses are influenced by inferred predictability, but it remains unclear how uncertainty, or its inverse, precision, is encoded within motor control networks. In this study, we combined computational modeling of reaching movement response speed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We used a cueing paradigm with changing cue predictability (~50%, ~70%, and ~90%) to test how predictive inference about left/right reaching responses affected cortical activity and network connectivity in 28 healthy young adults. Behavioral results showed that the response speed differences between invalid and valid cueing increased with a higher model-derived probability that the cue will be valid. The fMRI results revealed that activity in the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), the caudal part of dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd), and the cerebellum increased with higher uncertainty during valid trials. Moreover, the activation in the premotor cortex, bilateral inferior parietal lobe (IPL), IPS, and temporoparietal cortex was enhanced when reaching to invalidly cued targets (i.e., during motor reprogramming). Dynamic causal modeling revealed that uncertainty increased the connectivity from left to right IPS, from left IPS to cPMd, and from cPMd to primary motor cortex (M1) during valid trials. Motor reprogramming during invalid trials increased the coupling between bilateral IPL and strengthened pathways from IPL to M1 and from IPS to PMd, while decreasing connectivity from right to left IPS. These findings provide the first evidence of uncertainty-dependent network dynamics during reaching movements in the human brain and shed light on distinct neural mechanisms underlying precision-dependent motor control and motor reprogramming, with potential implications for psychiatric and neurological disorders characterized by aberrant precision control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.