ArticleHippocampus2026
Temporal Interference Modulates Medial Temporal and Frontoparietal Activity During Mnemonic Discrimination: A High-Resolution Whole-Brain fMRI Investigation.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mnemonic discrimination-the ability to distinguish between existing memories and similar new inputs-supports accurate memory in the face of interference (e.g., in a card game, recognizing that the card you are currently seeing, the King of Hearts, is distinct from the King of Diamonds you encountered earlier in the same hand). Although hippocampal pattern separation has been emphasized as a key mechanism for this process, recent theoretical frameworks and empirical findings suggest that surrounding medial temporal lobe and cortical regions also contribute by resolving interference. An important source of interference in everyday life is temporal interference: similar events may compete not only because they overlap perceptually, but also because they are separated by intervening experiences (e.g., distinguishing the King of Hearts you are currently holding in your hand from the King of Diamonds you encountered earlier in the game becomes increasingly difficult as additional cards are played and additional hands intervene between the two episodes). Here, we examined how temporal interference impacts mnemonic discrimination and its neural correlates using high-resolution fMRI and a continuous recognition task in which the lag between an item's first presentation and its subsequent target or similar lure was systematically manipulated (10, 60, or 140 intervening trials). Behaviorally, increasing lag impaired both mnemonic discrimination and target recognition. At the neural level, lag effects were not observed in hippocampal subfields. Instead, temporal interference modulated activity in extrahippocampal MTL regions including parahippocampal and perirhinal cortex, as well as distributed cortical regions including frontoparietal control areas. Importantly, lag-related modulation was process-specific, with partially dissociable patterns for successful mnemonic discrimination and target recognition. Together, these findings demonstrate that temporal interference engages a distributed MTL-cortical network that supports interference resolution during mnemonic discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.