ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Content and outcome of non-pharmacological rehabilitation for women with traumatic brain injury - a scoping review.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify and map evidence on the content and outcomes of non-pharmacological rehabilitation for women with traumatic brain injury.
designScoping review. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Women aged 18-65 years with traumatic brain injury of any severity.
methodsThe PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched. Studies including individuals with nontraumatic brain injuries, text and opinion papers, conference abstracts, study protocols, and grey literature were excluded. Inclusion criteria were: either ≥ 50% of the sample were women, or outcome data distinguished women's results from the rest of the sample. A data-extraction form was used. Extracted data included specific details concerning the participants, context, study methods, and key findings.
results41 studies with varying designs were included. None of the interventions described had a specific focus on women or women's needs. Community or outpatient settings dominated. The interventions were grouped into 3 main categories with underlying sub-categories - Alternative and complementary interventions, Training to restore functions, and Skills training to enhance cognitive functioning - with the latter category containing the most studies.
conclusionThe interventions described targeted a wide range of consequences from traumatic brain injury but without a clear gender perspective. Current rehabilitation models need to be developed to also include such a perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.