ArticleBMC oral health2026
Association between perceived stress and self-reported halitosis among university students: the mediating role of xerostomia, a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHalitosis is a common oral health concern with notable psychosocial consequences. Although psychological stress has been linked to various oral conditions, the specific mechanism through which perceived stress contributes to self-reported halitosis remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported halitosis among university students and to evaluate the associations between perceived stress levels, oral hygiene behaviors, xerostomia, and self-reported halitosis, with a particular focus on the potential mediating role of xerostomia.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 students from Çankırı Karatekin University's Faculty of Dentistry and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, using a non probability voluntary response sampling method. Data were collected via a self administered online questionnaire (Google Forms) that included items on demographic characteristics, oral hygiene behaviors, and single item questions on xerostomia and self-reported halitosis. Perceived stress was assessed using the validated Turkish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Associations were examined using chi square tests and binary logistic regression. The mediating role of xerostomia in the relationship between perceived stress and self-reported halitosis was evaluated through mediation analysis.
resultsThe prevalence of self-reported daytime halitosis was 18.5%, and 67.8% of participants reported xerostomia. Perceived stress was significantly associated with both self-reported halitosis and xerostomia. Mediation analysis revealed that xerostomia statistically mediated the association between perceived stress and self-reported halitosis (indirect effect = 0.653, 95% bootstrap CI [0.184, 1.122]). Xerostomia was a significant predictor of halitosis (OR = 3.249, 95% CI: 1.647-6.408, p = 0.001). Additionally, self-reported halitosis was significantly associated with brushing frequency, gingival bleeding, and smoking status. Statistically significant differences in perceived stress levels were observed based on gender and faculty of enrollment.
conclusionsPerceived stress is associated with self-reported halitosis among university students, and this association is statistically mediated by xerostomia. These findings suggest that xerostomia may represent a potential mechanism linking perceived stress and self-reported halitosis. Future studies employing larger samples and objective clinical measurements, such as sialometry and volatile sulfur compound analysis, are needed to confirm these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42823683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.