Trial reportInternational wound journal2026
A Composite Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Hyaluronic Acid CAMP for the Treatment of Full Thickness Wounds of the Foot in People With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a devastating complication of diabetes that markedly affects quality of life and generates significant socioeconomic and healthcare burdens. When DFUs fail to respond to standard of care (SOC), advanced therapies including Cellular, Acellular and Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) are often employed. A novel composite CAMP comprising ovine forestomach matrix and high molecular weight hyaluronic acid, termed 'OFM-HA' has been developed for the treatment of chronic wounds and evaluated in a prospective multi-centre controlled trial. For this trial, 143 subjects were randomized to receive OFM-HA plus SOC or SOC alone for the treatment of chronic full thickness wounds of the foot in people with diabetes meeting prespecified eligibility criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of wounds healed by 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included healing time, percentage area reduction, adverse events and changes in pain and quality of life. For the modified intent-to-treat population, 46% (31/68) of the OFM-HA plus SOC group healed by 12 weeks compared to 24% (17/72) in the SOC alone group (p = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier analysis favoured OFM-HA plus SOC over 12 weeks (log-rank p = 0.023). No unexpected safety-related occurrences were observed. OFM-HA plus SOC increased 12-week closure in this selected population. Interpretation is limited by post-randomization exclusions, differential withdrawal and an adjusted comparison close to the significance threshold (p = 0.045).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.