ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
No evidence for facilitated response-related processing in contextual cueing.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual search can be facilitated by learning statistical regularities; for example, repeated exposure to the same spatial layout of search items can speed target detection (contextual cueing). While contextual cueing is usually attributed to improved attentional guidance towards the target, some studies have proposed that the benefit for repeated search layouts may also facilitate response-related processing after the target has been localized. To test this latter account, the current study systematically manipulated the difficulty of the target-related decision by varying the number of possible response alternatives, while keeping attentional guidance constant. If response selection is facilitated by the repeated contexts, a more difficult target-related decision should leave more space for a benefit of contextual cueing to emerge, compared to that with an easier response selection. The results from Experiment 1 showed that contextual cueing was not improved with four versus two possible response alternatives, thus indicating that repeated contexts do not facilitate response selection. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 then provided additional, "learnable" (i.e., repeating and thus predictable) response cues, but this manipulation also did not enhance contextual cueing, with neither two nor four possible response alternatives. This pattern of results thus suggests that contextual cueing primarily facilitates attentional guidance and does not extend to response-related processing after locating a to-be-searched for target, even when consistent response regularities are available. OPEN PRACTICES STATEMENT: All raw trial-level data, subject means and data-analysis scripts have been made publicly available via the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/pdtwy/ . The design and the analysis plans for the experiments were not preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42823601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.