Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823574›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2026

Surrogacy of intermediate clinical endpoints for overall survival in BCG-naïve high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Pietro Scilipoti, Aleksander Ślusarczyk, José Daniel Subiela, Mattia Longoni, Angelo Occhi, Paolo Zaurito, Giovanni Tremolada, Brigida Maiorano, Francesco Soria, Wojciech Krajewski and 33 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors.

Pietro ScilipotiDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. scilipoti.pietro@hsr.it.
Aleksander Ślusarczyk *Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
José Daniel SubielaDepartment of Urology, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Mattia LongoniDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Angelo OcchiDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Paolo ZauritoDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni TremoladaDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Brigida MaioranoDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SoriaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Francesco ClapsOncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Renate PichlerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth Grobet-JeandinDivision of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Luca AfferiDepartment of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Riccardo MastroianniIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SimoneIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Laura S MertensDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
José Luis Rodriguez ElenaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain.
Javier ArandaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain.
Alfonso Lafuente PuenteduraDepartment of Urology, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Caño VelascoClinica Universidad De Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Roberto ContieriDepartment of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Federico ZorziDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Urology Unit, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Giovanni LiguoriDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Urology Unit, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Rodolfo HurleDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Ottone CirulliDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Richard NasproDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Gautier MarcqDepartment of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Paolo GonteroDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Morgan RouprêtSorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, 75013, Paris, France.
Thomas SeisenSorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, 75013, Paris, France.
Francesco MontorsiDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.
Marco MoschiniDepartment of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
European Association of Urology -Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urothelial carcinoma working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent trials in BCG-naïve high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) have added immunotherapy to BCG, often using event-free survival (EFS) as the primary endpoint. However, neither EFS nor progression-free survival (PFS) has been validated as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in this setting.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 18 international centers, including patients with BCG-naïve HR-NMIBC treated between 2001 and 2025. Adequate BCG exposure (International Bladder Cancer Group criteria) was the treatment contrast for its effects on intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) and OS, using a 12-month landmark approach and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Surrogacy was assessed with: (1) adapted Prentice criteria, with time-varying ICEs in IPTW-adjusted Cox models for OS; and (2) an emulated two-stage meta-analytic framework estimating individual-level association (Kendall's τ) and pseudo-trial-level surrogacy (R

resultsOf 3384 patients, 3153 entered the landmark analysis; 2697 (85.5%) received adequate BCG. Median follow-up was 50 months (IQR 17-77). Adequate BCG was associated with improved OS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.83) and lower risks of PFS events (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.58) and EFS events (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40-0.58). Both ICEs were independently associated with OS, but adjusting for each did not fully attenuate the BCG effect. Individual-level association with OS was strong for PFS (τ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.83) and EFS (τ = 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.75). Pseudo-trial-level surrogacy was moderate, with median R

conclusionsIn this exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis, PFS and EFS were strongly associated with OS at the individual level but failed to demonstrate robust pseudo-trial-level surrogacy. These endpoints may not fully capture treatment effects on OS, warranting caution when interpreting ICE-driven trial results in BCG-naïve HR-NMIBC.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAgedEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSurrogacySurvival RateAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineAdequate BCGBacillus Calmette-GuerinEvent-free survivalNon-muscle invasive bladder cancerOverall survivalProgression-free survivalSurrogacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.