Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823568›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Locate Then Classify: A Heterogeneous Dual-Teacher Consensus Framework for Semi-Supervised Mammogram Diagnosis.

Xiaowen Tang, Siyu Wang, Haiyan Wang, Kang Gu, Na Yin, Shan Zhuang, Changfei Mao, Yan Yang, Min Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaowen TangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-8967
Siyu WangWuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Haiyan WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Kang GuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Na YinDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Shan ZhuangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Changfei MaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Yan YangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Min DongDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 42, 42 Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China. dongmin@jszlyy.com.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Young Scientists Fund) Grant No. 82204524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) offers a pathway to reduce the high cost of pixel-wise annotation in mammography, but classical teacher-student methods suffer from confirmation bias under extreme label scarcity. To address this, we propose a heterogeneous dual-teacher consensus framework (DTSL). Two complementary teachers, one detail-oriented (shallow SE attention) and one semantic-oriented (deep gated modulation), retain pseudo-labels only when they agree, thereby filtering unreliable predictions. Using only 30% of pixel-level labels, DTSL recovers 81.5% of fully supervised segmentation performance (Dice Similarity Coefficient, DSC = 0.626) and achieves a calcification intersection over union (IoU) of 0.700, reducing annotation cost by 70%. It outperforms standard Mean Teacher (78.1%) and nnU-Net plus Mean Teacher (79.8%). The trained segmentation encoder is then transferred to a classification head, injecting morphological priors into malignancy diagnosis. On the INbreast dataset, our classifier attains an AUC of 0.872 and a sensitivity of 0.837, surpassing the average sensitivity of four senior radiologists (0.803) by 3.4 percentage points (p < 0.05). Our model's superior sensitivity suggests its potential as a decision-support tool to reduce false negatives in screening, warranting prospective clinical validation. Grad-CAM visualizations confirm that attention maps align with radiologists' diagnostic cues. The source code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/BrXNetCls-0C14/ .

Indexed as

Annotation efficiencyComputer-assisted diagnosisConfirmation biasImage interpretationMammographySemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.