ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Decoding surgical competence: surgical gesture analysis can determine competence in simulated VATS lobectomy, a validation study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive thoracic surgery has become the standard of care, but is technically demanding, making objective assessment of technical competency essential during training. Video based surgical gesture analysis is a novel and objective method to evaluate technical skills during training for video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomies.
methodsVATS lobectomy videos performed on a virtual reality simulator were annotated using a predefined surgical gesture taxonomy including blunt dissection, sharp dissection, ribbon use, and stapler use. Gesture metrics included duration, frequency, idle time, and entropy. Principal component analysis and a support vector machine were used to generate gesture-based performance scores. Validity evidence was assessed against simulator-derived metrics and human expert ratings using the VATS assessment tool (VATSAT).
resultsSurgical gesture analysis (SGA) was performed on 123 simulated VATS lobectomy procedures where 22 novices, 10 intermediates, and 9 experienced VATS surgeons performed three procedures each. Experienced surgeons had shorter procedure time (24.2 ± 9.2 min) than both intermediates (35.5 ± 9.9 min, p < 0.001) and novices (40.1 ± 14.3 min, p < 0.001), and mean gesture duration was significantly shorter for experienced (7 ± 1 s) compared with intermediates (8 ± 2 s, p = 0.026) and novices (11 ± 3 s, p < 0.001). Variability in gesture duration also decreased with experience (p < 0.001) and overall entropy showed significant group differences for novices compared with intermediates (p = 0.02) and experts (p = 0.049). Gestures correlated with simulator metrics and VATSAT scores, suggesting these reflected similar performance dimensions. SGA was able to classify experience level with a pass/fail threshold, achieving a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 97.5%.
conclusionSGA can be used to assess technical performance for simulated VATS lobectomies. It was able to differentiate between experience levels for multiple parameters, and has potential advantages compared with existing assessments such as rating scales and simulator metrics. Further studies are needed to explore the applicability on real procedures and the clinical implications of Surgical Gesture Analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42823547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.