Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823515›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Neo-Umbilicoplasty Through Umbilical Pedicle Anchoring: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Agostino Bruno, Marco Schirosi, Riccardo Foti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agostino BrunoSanta Maria di Leuca Clinic, Via Tiberina, 178, 00188, Rome, RM, Italy.
Marco SchirosiSanta Maria di Leuca Clinic, Via Tiberina, 178, 00188, Rome, RM, Italy.
Riccardo FotiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133, Rome, Italy. riccardofoti.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9549-7952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe umbilicus is a central aesthetic landmark of the abdomen and a key determinant of patient satisfaction after abdominoplasty. Although preservation and transposition of the native umbilicus are feasible in most cases, certain anatomical and surgical conditions render umbilical preservation unsafe or impractical, making neo-umbilicoplasty a reconstructive necessity.

objectivesTo describe a novel neo-umbilicoplasty technique based on anchoring the neo-umbilical flaps to the residual umbilical pedicle and to evaluate its aesthetic outcomes, reliability, and complication profile.

methodsA retrospective single-surgeon study was performed on consecutive patients undergoing full abdominoplasty or lipoabdominoplasty between March 2022 and March 2024 in whom the native umbilicus was excised and reconstructed using the described technique. Indications included large umbilical hernias, compromised or elongated umbilical stalks, severe rectus diastasis, and revision cases. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed using a standardized Likert scale (1-5) by two blinded plastic surgeons at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Umbilicus-related complications and long-term morphological stability were recorded.

resultsThirty-six patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 11.2 months. The mean composite aesthetic score improved from 4.12 at 3 months to 4.48 at 6 months and remained stable at 12 months. Patient satisfaction increased from a mean VAS of 8.6 to 9.2, with sustained results at late follow-up. No cases of umbilical necrosis, stenosis, progressive flattening, or loss of depth were observed. All complications were minor and managed conservatively.

conclusionsNeo-umbilicoplasty through umbilical pedicle anchoring provides accurate positioning, durable depth, and high aesthetic satisfaction with minimal additional fascial stress. It represents a reliable reconstructive option in complex abdominoplasty cases when native umbilical preservation is not feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyDiastasisPost-bariatric surgeryUmbilicoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.