Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823482›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2026

Operationalizing the EU AI Act in a comprehensive cancer center through an institutional governance framework.

W Gehin, J C Faivre, J E Bibault, Y Thiery, S Deon, E Desandes, A Lambert, A Baudin, M Schoumacker, P Eschwege and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

W GehinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. w.gehin@nancy.unicancer.fr.
J C FaivreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
J E BibaultDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, Paris, France.
Y ThieryExecutive Management, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
S DeonInformation Systems Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
E DesandesHealth Data Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
A LambertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
A BaudinHealth Data Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
M SchoumackerProject Management Office, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
P EschwegeUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, Nancy, France.
S SupiotDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.
T PerennecDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.
D PeiffertExecutive Management, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EU AI Act subjects high-risk clinical AI systems to deployer obligations whose institutional operationalization remains undefined. Drawing on experience at a French comprehensive cancer center, we present a governance framework combining three novel components: a dual-axis model for institutional risk stratification, a five-category AI-related adverse event taxonomy inspired by pharmacovigilance, and structured proficiency testing against simulated AI errors. Successful AI integration depends on institutional readiness, not algorithmic performance.

Identifiers

PMID42823482
PMCPMC13631284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.